Tampilkan postingan dengan label Photographer. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Photographer. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 30 Agustus 2011

Wedding photography lenses that every photographer can not do without

There are generally four types of lens photograph every wedding photographer should have in his Gig Bag:


Wide-angle zoom
Wide-telephoto zoom lens
Image-stabilized telephoto zoom
Prime lenses / portrait

Wide-angle zoom

Wide-angle lenses have a zoom of the main objectives photograph every wedding photographer would normally 17mm to 35 mm in length with a fixed aperture of 2.8. They offer a great depth of fieldArea, which makes it easier to get in the foreground and background in focus. They are an indispensable wedding photography equipment, which allows flexibility in confined spaces such as a banquet hall or dance floor crowded. While shorter Goals allow you to capture more details, zoom wide-angle lenses allow you to get more reactions and atmosphere to tell a richer story.

To elaborate further, in order to zoom wide-angle photography to take a broader perspective of momentsHappening all over the big problem, and provide a broader picture of the whole event. For example, wide-angle photos are able to say: "stories in a story" so that they reveal more about the history behind the shot. This is essential for a good photojournalistic wedding photography. As the events surrounding the wedding are so time sensitive, slow good photograph can capture as many actions or emotions in the shortest possible time.

When used in a place likeas the church or ballroom, wide-angle lenses with zoom camera also increases the size and spaciousness of the area that embodies the feeling of a creative photography photojournalistic wedding.

However, you must be selective action scenes or zoom with wide angle lenses to shoot wide as a limitation is that it creates a distortion of the body, especially if a subject is photographed close up. In general, people tend to look heavier and shorter on the sides, whileIt may seem huge arms. The last thing you want is to have the bride put curse for having provided her look like she has to £ 10! To overcome this problem, you should avoid as far as possible, that the bride and groom at the edges of wide angle distortion. In addition, the wide-angle photography is disruptive or introduce unwanted elements into the frame, which would otherwise ruin a perfect moment of the image.

Wide-telephoto zoom lens

Wide-Tele-Objectives The objectives are the most important, is not a wedding photographer can do without. You should ideally have lenses that can cover somewhere around the 20-70mm focal length with an aperture of f/2.8. The ideal offer, you can be wide enough to take a group photo and close enough to capture facial emotion in a snapshot or three-quarter portrait of a couple without the negative effects of wide-angle perspective distortion. They also serve as a good target for doublePortraits. Since only this goal, we would be able to more shots needed for a wedding to capture decently well.

Image-stabilized telephoto zoom

Tele-image-stabilized zoom lenses are also essential elements for your wedding list photo equipment. The 70-200mm focal length is an important area for wedding photos. It allows you to make more room for subjects in situations where you do not want to get in your way. How often have youShooting down the aisle from the back of the church came to image-stabilized telephoto zoom very useful. 200mm is long enough to be able, 3 / 4 length photos of the bride and groom exchange vows taken during the stay a reasonable distance is wide, and 70mm from the action enough to get the bridesmaids and groomsmen as a group of To shoot without switching lenses.

A positive point is that it could occur when using photography as a slow, beautiful background blurreached a maximum aperture f/2.8 focal lengths wide and 200mm long or 300mm, if you have a full frame sensor or a small body. This helps isolate the subject from the background, and focus on the image you portray as the main subject focus. These lenses are ideal for photography in which no shots are close and intimate and private moments where you want to get to an unseen stranger at a distance. Some examples arefurtive glance, a mischievous smile, a kiss - the data that are effectively communicated emotions. Image-stabilized telephoto zoom photography therefore play an important role in the collection of these moments.

These image stabilized telephoto zoom photography are not only good for background blur events or shooting from a distance. Could also be used to be awesome facial close-ups of creative angle up or down the theme that do not show the normal patternDistortion of the chin or large heads contraction, which come from a wider lens photography.

Another advantage of such a goal is the photo that you can use the 1.5x crop factor camera's small sensor in your favor. The long end of the 200/2.8 would be convenient standard zoom lens 300/2.8, a goal, which is $ 4000 for a full-frame camera. The effective length of 300mm makes creative photo corners shorter Camcorders, like images cut out from closeSpouse hands to lift the veil of the bride or the bride and groom hands as they put any rings on his fingers.

The obvious disadvantage of image-stabilized telephoto zoom to pull in many cases, long-lens photography, the subject of the most important scene, and tilt would be little or no context, because the problem was, they felt could be expressed as the place of the subject and who else was there.

When using a small camera sensorMain body or backup, the other disadvantage of image-stabilized telephoto zoom, that not one of Nikon, Canon or Sony for an f/2.8 lens, which will make you an effective 70-200mm focal length. Therefore, you should pay the high price and bear the weight of the lens photography to the capabilities of a full frame camera is.

Canon Image Stabilization, Vibration Reduction Nikon and Sony's SteadyShot INSIDE are systems in which the hand-holding this very importantand heavy long lens photography, especially in low light situations. Every wedding photographer should ensure that the image stablization and features vibration reduction lens is long. You might also consider using a tripod to ensure the continuous, precise positioning of the subject and sharp photos. These tele-photo zoom lens is a huge investment, and if you have a budget constraint or an amateur just starting out, you might consider hiringinstead.

Prime Lenses

Prime lenses are essentially fixed focal length lenses as zoom lenses, variable focal length 24-70mm say they oppose or have 17-55mm. Prime lenses are generally in better quality than the mode optical zoom lens, and usually with large maximum apertures like 2.8 or 1.8.

Good fixed focal length lenses are must-have for wedding photographers and photography, are honored for their goodPortraits. Even if you have enough for a wedding shoot with the three zoom lenses in a lens kit to have, as described above, it is also worth two fast prime lenses in the bag 58 as well. This photo lenses are compact, lightweight and relatively inexpensive and probably run around 10 to 20% from a wedding requires.

Photography lenses are ideal fastest main situations in which the opening of f/2.8 is not enough to stop the movement, the shutter speed or get flatDepth of field is desired, both for artistic or technical reasons. For example, one image at 1/20th of a second shutter speed to 2.8 you need only require 1/60th of a second at 1.8, makes a distinction between a photo and a sharp focus. Many professional wedding photographers are actually fixed focal length concert in their bags as the economic security of their zoom lenses. Not many people can afford to buy a further 70-200mm f/2.8 telephoto as a backup and you alsowant a situation where desperate not to share your camera lens so that during a crucial moment.

There are many prime lenses on the market, but most photographers would have a 28/1.8, 50/1.8, 85/1.8 and included in their first photo lens kit for use on a full frame body. The 28mm is wide enough to cover the ceremony and most places in tight spaces, the 50mm is good for many small groups, or a priest blessing a couple, and 85 mm is sufficient for the ceremony and vowsExchange of rings. A successful marriage can be photographed only with these three lenses Photography.

Selasa, 16 November 2010

What Kind of Camera Should My Wedding Photographer Use?

If you are in the process of looking for a wedding photographer, chances are you will soon here the terms: medium format, 35mm, and digital. Those are the three primary types of camera systems currently used by wedding photographers. We, the wedding photographers, have argued amongst ourselves for years as to which camera system is best. The goal of this article is to share information about these types of camera systems and the possible impact they may have on your wedding photographer decision.

Medium Format

For many years medium format has been the absolute best option. A medium format camera uses film that is 3 times the size of a 35mm negative-- resulting in higher resolution images and beautiful enlargements, however, the cameras and processing costs are very expensive.

Primary advantages: high resolution negatives. Previously, the fact that a person owned a Medium Format camera was almost, in and of itself, a sign that they were a true "wedding photographer" (due to the expense of the system).

Disadvantages: expensive to operate (film costs are so high that some wedding photography books encourage medium format photographers to limit the photos they take); film can be lost or damaged during processing; slower to focus and operate.

35mm

For many years 35mm has had a bad reputation for providing poor quality enlargements -- especially when compared to medium format. However, over the past 10 years the quality of 35mm film has improved tremendously. It is now a common format used by many professional photographers, especially those who use the photojournalistic style and shoot close to a thousand or more images on a wedding day.

Primary advantages to 35mm: fast (easy to quickly focus and shoot during), much improved quality of enlargements (many people would have a hard time telling the difference between a 35mm and medium format 8x10 enlargement).

Disadvantages: processing film is becoming more and more expensive, and film can be damaged or loss during processing.. Many photographers that shoot film are now having the negatives scanned so that the files become a digital file.

Digital

Professional digital wedding photography has been a viable option since about the year 2000 (although some would argue that date). The quality of digital cameras has now reached a point where many photographers feel the quality rivals, or even beats, medium format negatives. In fact, many digital wedding photographers used to shoot medium format.

Primary digital advantages: instant review of images on the back of the camera; no film and processing costs (although the savings is offset by the additional computer time required to process the digital images); more control over the images (i.e., a slight rotation or cropping of an image is quick and easy with digital but requires a custom print from 35mm or medium format).

Disadvantages: technology changes rapidly over time and cameras soon are outdated (although this doesn't necessarily effect you, as the consumer). Memory cards are easier to lose than rolls of film (if your wedding photographer uses a digital camera, ask them how they make sure the photos arrive safely back at the studio).

In summary:

No matter what you have been told - all three formats can be a viable method for wedding photography. Some might be more expensive than others, but they all can produce good results. Many photographers use several of the camera systems. Some might use medium format for the formals but 35mm for the reception and ceremony coverage. Others will primarily shoot digital, but might bring film cameras as backup equipment.

My advice to prospective brides: before signing a contract with a photographer, ask to see sample enlargements that were taken with the same equipment that would be used at your wedding. If you like the quality and color of the images, it doesn't really matter whether 35mm, digital, or a medium format camera was used to record the image!




Christopher Maxwell is a Kansas Wedding Photographer that accepts limited weddings (primarily conservative Christian weddings with modest attire). He is a primarily photojournalistic photographer and has traveled to a number of weddings.

Kamis, 29 Juli 2010

MY Life As a Photographer

The time was back in 1980 when I turned 13 years of age and all I could think of was being a photographer. Now that I look back on it there is no doubt in my mind that this was in no small part inspired by those photographs I saw in the Vogue magazines my mother would keep in her shop, her being one of New York's top dress makers. There are those that may even find this odd but I actually found more in the way of sexuality and specially sensuality in those photographs in Vogue then the Playboy magazine's I had seen in my sister's apartment (her husband being a subscriber to this magazine) or the many other magazines of the same nature which were always to be found in abundance in my cousin's room out on Long Island.

Actually I had even grown bored of such magazines; finding that all they did was expose female nudity while adding very little of anything to excite the imagination let alone the desire in me to see more. Yes, they had allowed me to see the womanly body but after awhile I saw no mystery; when one day it happened while in my mother's office. I took to looking at a Vogue magazine and I was really taken aback and agitated. Men and women and though not revealing any part of their anatomies that I would not have seen on any other magazine; they were made to pose in such a way that raised my interest like nothing before. Some photographs even included women with other women, not even doing anything that could be considered overly suggestive but the way they were captured implied so much in its subtlety which might have been in the form of one woman sitting on another woman's lap or kneeling to her while holding her hand perhaps in an almost comic jest. Of course there were those that showed a group of men, sometimes two carrying a woman in away that at an earlier part of my life would have gone undetected by my eye but in this stage were making me take notice to the way it was possible to arouse the senses with just posses of beauty in clothes that perhaps had just as much sex appeal as nudity.

To a lot of the boys my age, such photographs like the ones to be found in magazines like Vogue might have seemed tepid. Them mostly being interested in looking at the more graphic pictures to be found in other magazines of a different nature however to me these photographs because of what they did not show but suggested might happen left me with a wish of seeing more. It was the not so subtle way a couple looked at one another or the way a woman's hand might be placed on a man, not on any part of his intimacy but with intensions of reaching, the sexually suggestive yet elegant way they were dressed that left me unfulfilled; longing to see more. This in a way was a great sensation as opposed to those nudity magazines I had known till then that because of their more explicit nature left my mind the moment they went out of my sight and did nothing to enhance my imagination.

It was also during this time that through commercials on television I became acquainted to the many cameras available. Minolta, Cannon and Olympus seemed like such interesting pieces of photographic equipment that allowed one to focus on the subject one was looking to capture. This was a feature that up till then I had not known cameras to have as the only one's that had ever come in to my hands were the ones on which all one did was point the camera at the subject in question and press the button. This was something I had never even considered, the idea of being able to focus on the subject. Naturally these cameras were very expensive, specially in those days so that year for my birthday my mother gave me a Polaroid camera to take with me on my first trip to Europe in a long time that would include stopovers in Italy, France and my brother's native country of Spain.

My brother-in-law however had an Olympus SLR (single lens reflex) which I very much enjoyed using even if it was only to look through as I rarely got to take photographs with it but it was those moments that I spent looking through the lens and focusing on many an object; weather they be at home or while looking out the window that I discovered what focusing was all about. I previously had been of the idea that focusing was the act of making the picture clear; much like one did with a television when one tuned it (of course, I am referring to those TV sets of the late 70s) instead of what it really was which was setting the distance between oneself and the object one was trying to photograph. It seemed so strange to me how one second an object that was so near was made clear while those that were further were not and then just a split second later those objects that had been so blurry were suddenly clear while those that had been clear were no longer even recognizable to the eye any more.

Perhaps it was just having fun but it made me see photography in a whole new way as before all it had been about was taking photographs of relatives posing usually on special occasions such as Christmas or birthdays or in places where we had been to; just to remember what had been. These photographs rarely were shown to any who were not in them and were usually kept in albums for the sake of having souvenirs but then as I looked at even everyday objects with this camera I started seeing photography as much more then a way of remembering last year's Christmas or things of the sort but as a way of creating art. I started to see how it was possible to photograph objects just so they might make an interesting photograph if nothing else.

It was also in 1980 that I observed for the first time what a zoom lens was and though I did not even know what it was called I knew it could bring me closer to objects in a way that at first glance seemed amazing as I will never forget the first time I had a chance to see it for myself. It happened in Rome while looking at the Coliseum from the large avenue that leads to it that my brother-in-law let me see what a zoom lens was all about. First he let me see the Coliseum with a 35mm lens then when my eye had gotten used to the view he suddenly did something to the lens while I was still looking through it that all of sudden and to my almost total shock made me feel as if some sort of force had pushed me toward the Coliseum. It was as if I had been placed in a very fast moving vehicle that had accelerated me toward it. I can not even claim that it seemed that the coliseum had increased in size or that it was as if it had been brought closer to where I was but the impression was one I will never forget as I have not experienced it since. Thrilling was how I would have described it then and perhaps because I had no idea of what would happen and when it did it even seemed amazing though looking back on that moment that is what it was all about. The fact that I had not expected it and nothing else specially since the view had only shifted from that of a 35mm lens to a 80mm lens.

As for the rest of the trip through Italy, France and Spain, it saw me take many a photograph with my Polaroid camera but none which I would keep for very long as this camera did not really lend itself to giving me the results I had seen with other cameras. As a matter of fact I ended up giving away most of these photographs to friends and relatives who strangely enough appreciated them more then I did though I must say it was a great thrill to take them. Perhaps it was just the thought that I was capturing on film all those landmarks which passed through my sight that summer such as the Coliseum, the tower of Pisa, Venice's Piazza San Marco and its canals and many others that made the taking of those photographs such a memorable experience, much more then the actual photographs. However regardless of what it was the memory of having taken those photographs will stay with me forever even if it did not take me more then a month to give them away after my return to New York.

As much as I had enjoyed taking those photographs, photography was not a hobby I followed up on my return to New York, this being much to my lament as other matters seemed to get in the way. It actually was not till many years later in 1986 when upon my return to New York after having spent most of the summer in Los Angeles and San Francisco; I bought a camera. An automatic focus Olympus 35mm camera with a 35mm lens which simplified taking photographs as all I had to do was aim and fire, this undoubtedly made taking photographs extremely easy and for awhile that is all I did. In a way it was strange when I think about it now so many years later how having a camera, even a simple one made me want to visit all those landmarks like the Empire State Building or the World Trade Center that I had never taken the time to see despite or perhaps because of having been born in New York.

Having this camera even gave me a sensation of being a tourist in my own city as I took photographs of all those places that so much attracted visitors from all over the world and perhaps for the first time saw what was so special about them. Ever since my 1980 trip to Europe I had been fascinated by photography but it was then more then ever that I really started to enjoy it and not just photographing those well known sights but even people in their daily lives or those things that most people take for granted like a subway station during rush-hour or the street I lived on which at the time was Lexington Av. between 82nd and 81st street.

With time I became more and more interested in experimenting with photography but eventually came to the realization that there was only so much I could do with a camera that could not be changed to manual focus so with this in my mind I waited till Christmas when with the money I got plus what I managed to save up bought myself my first SLR. It was my first camera which I could focus for myself as well change the lenses from its standard 50mm to a zoom lens that covered everything from 70mm to 200mm. To many it might seem odd but I actually made the purchase of this camera which like my first one was an Olympus on Christmas day of 1986 and immediately started shooting everything insight specially all the trappings of the holiday season such as Christmas trees and so many other things that composed this time of year.

With the coming of the new year my hobby turned in to a passion that saw me photograph not only many of New York's most famous places like the New York Metropolitan Opera but people, some of whom I knew and others whom I managed to capture on the street. By now the year was 1987 and the more photographs I took the less satisfied I became with the results as I never managed to get just what I was after as there always seemed to be something missing from my photographs. It seemed to me that my photographs did not have that certain something that made photographs special and lifted them in to that category of being art and try as I might and take as many photographs as I did I could not manage to get what I wanted. Of course one should take in to account that in those days photography was a much more expensive hobby then it is today as analog photography did not allow one the benefit of looking at one's photographs before one had them developed to see which ones were worth keeping.

However in all this it was not lack of the results I sought after that discouraged me but quite the opposite and by the summer of the same year I decided that I was going to become a professional photographer and why not? I was only twenty years of age and photography was something I enjoyed and felt I could do and earn a living from and in my attempt to become one I found a course in the mail which I signed up for. It was actually thanks to the material I got from this school that learnt the basics of photography that included some techniques which one was required to take what I would I refer to as a well taken photograph. Here I will list some of the ideas which I picked up from this course that helped me become the photographer I wished to be.

1) When taking a photograph, always remember that each photograph should tell some kind of story or have a message connected to it. For instance if one is taking a photograph of a person, then the message is that person or the person's expression or perhaps the beauty of that person may the person be male or female. The subject does not however need to be a person as it could be a landmark or a busy street; in that case the theme of the photograph might be to show how people go about their daily life in a big city. However in choosing a subject we should keep it simple and limit it to one subject per photograph, two or more makes for confusion.

2) After one has decided what message to tell one should include in the photograph all those elements that will help get this message across and leave out all those that will distract from it. For instance if one is taking a photograph of the Eiffel Tower, then that would be the main theme and it should be the only thing that appears in the photograph, making it not necessary to include one's friends or relatives in the photograph as in that case the viewer will not be able to appreciate either one as the person in question will appear very small in comparensence to the Eiffel Tower. It is my advise we should only photograph one subject at a time for he who tries to photograph to many things in one shot ends up photographing nothing. So in other words if we wish to photograph our friends let them be the only thing in the photograph and if we wish to photograph a monument or landscape let that be the only thing in the photograph as well. There is after all some truth in the statement "less is more".

Naturally there are other tips I could give in this article but it was these two that really helped to turn me in to the photographer I wanted to be; who after having completed not only this course but several others at New York's "Fashion Institute of Technology" and at Rome's "Instituto Superiore de la Fotografia" went on to get his work published in several magazines.

My first work published though not my last came in 1990 and three years after I had switched over to Minolta for a Polish magazine which is no longer printed called "Women and Life". It was during my long stay in Warsaw that I noticed a lot of homeless people and drug addicts appearing on the streets as the HIV virus had finally made its way to Poland. I felt this was something which needed to be shown to those not yet aware of this which to most people in Poland at the time was new. After having decided to take these photographs I got in touch with the editor-in-chief of the above mentioned magazine and asked her if she would be interested in publishing such photographs. At first she did not really know what to say but told me she would first need to see my photographs before taking such decisions.

I naturally the week that followed went about taking photographs of all those people I saw on the street with signs asking for money because they had been diagnosed with the HIV virus but still I had no photograph that truly got the message through of that despair that I was attempting to show. That despair that drives people to beg for money or steal or do what ever they can to buy a little bite of that drug their body so much cries out for. This was what I wanted but where could I get such a photograph or find a person or a group of people willing to let me take their photograph so it could appear in a magazine? This was the question I could not answer and despite having enough photographs to present; still that one shot was missing.

I am still unaware of why it happened specially when I so much needed it to but it did. One day when I was entering my building I saw a young man whose appearance was very dirty with clothes that made it clear that he had been sleeping on floors as he was probably homeless. He even seemed frightened as if I might tell him to leave the building or call for the police but just as I saw him the idea came to me and I asked with a great deal of enthusiasm if I could photograph him. It was then that this young man took me by surprise by pulling a syringe out of his pocket and pretending to inject himself. I instantly got the shot, not wasting anytime as I really was not going to ask him to repeat the gesture. I managed to catch him right at the moment when it appeared that the needle was about to enter his arm though the reality was that it was him only imitating an act he undoubtedly had done in the past and would do again in the future. As for the expression on his face; this was the real greatness of this shot if any were to be found in it. The way he in his raggedy clothes, who probably had been reduced by this drug to having so little left took so much relief from the escape that this drug, which to this day I am not even sure of what it was offered. It was a moment in time which I felt I captured so well, as it let one know for that split second how it might feel for someone in such conditions. I managed to take only one shot but this was all I needed after which I gave him the sum of 5,000 Zloty (1 USD which back then went a lot further then it does now a days) for his efforts.

The following week I handed my photographs to the editor-in-chief of "Women and Life" whose name I recall being Sofia Kaminska (though my memory may not serve me well on this one) who told me she might have problems with some of them. Her reasons being that they exposed people but she said this could be remedied by simply putting black spaces on their eyes to hide their identities which is exactly what they did. I all the same left the photographs realizing full well that I had done my part and that the rest was not up to me as it was now in their hands to publish these photographs or not. Fortunately for me it came about the following week that I was told that my photographs would get published which is precisely what happened.

There was something special about getting those photographs published that in a way made me feel for the first time that I was a true photographer. This being the case even though the money I got paid for them was barely enough to cover the cost of the film and developing I still felt a great sense of accomplishment when I saw my photos in that magazine which I knew to be one of Poland's most popular with my name listed as the photographer. There were so many factors but one of the strongest was the sensation that people all over Poland were looking at my photograph and seeing what I had wanted them to. I would go on to have more of my work published in magazines and newspapers, some in the states like the photographs I took of a shanty town in Lima, Peru and many others but there was something about those first photographs that will never abandon my memory.

With time I eventually lost my passion for photography and developed one for writing which is what I am currently doing but I do find it nice from time to time to reminisce of those years which I spent working as a photographer in which there was no place where I would go without my camera. Photography meant everything to me that feeling of finding something a person, a place or whatever and being able to capture it for others to see. It was that split second that I prided myself in preserving for the rest of eternity, that second that was so unique which would never return but thanks to my eye and camera would not be lost.

As for subjects which I enjoyed photographing, it is in earnest that I can claim that I had no particular subject which I preferred photographing as all subjects had something of interest to me weather they be people I saw on the street or in public places or inanimate objects or buildings or nude models. I saw beauty in everything and everyone from the innocence of the child to the dignity of the older person to the sexuality of the women who attracted me to the strength of men who I encountered which I felt I could bring out in a photograph by finding the right angle and light for it and how I would do my utmost to do so. Of course there was also the issue of setting the right shutter speed and aperture on my camera as well as selecting the right lens along with the right film that made taking what I considered to be great photographs a challenge.

The act of photography meant everything to me as I poured all I had in to them, my imagination and feelings were not spared from going in to those photographs which I took though strangely enough perhaps to some I never became sentimental about the photographs I took once I had taken them. I of course would look at them to see that all had come out as I had wanted it to but other then that I would not look at them much after. This being the case as to me the whole art lay in the work I did to obtain the photograph; to the point where the photograph itself held no meaning. I even went on to give away or sell many of the photographs; naturally keeping the negatives and the reason for this being that I wanted to be able to reproduce them to show to others.